Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Future Microbiol ; 17: 1287-1294, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2039611

ABSTRACT

Background: A dysregulated inflammatory response contributes to decline in patients with COVID-19. This cross-sectional study evaluated biomarkers of unvaccinated patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Methods: Twenty cytokines were quantified upon hospital admission; clinical and laboratory data were analyzed, as well as sociodemographic data, to search for an association with clinical outcomes, including fatal (n = 40) or recovered cases (n = 38). Results: Fatal cases exhibited significantly higher levels of IL-18 (p = 0.009); deceased patients were older (p = 0.0001), had a lower number of platelets (p = 0.0063) and higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.0230) than those who recovered. Conclusion: These findings indicate that IL-18 is a possible marker to predict poor prognosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Biomarkers , Brazil/epidemiology , Critical Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cytokines , Hospitals , Humans , Interleukin-18 , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Med Virol ; 94(9): 4170-4180, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1826058

ABSTRACT

We adopted the reverse-transcriptase-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) in patient samples. Two primer sets for genes N and Orf1ab were designed to detect SARS-CoV-2, and one primer set was designed to detect the human gene Actin. We collected prospective 138 nasopharyngeal swabs, 70 oropharyngeal swabs, 69 salivae, and 68 mouth saline wash samples from patients suspected to have severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 to test the RT-LAMP in comparison with the gold standard technique reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction  (RT-qPCR). The accuracy of diagnosis using both primers, N5 and Orf9, was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87-99) and 85% (95% CI: 76-91) in 138 samples, respectively. Accurate diagnosis results were obtained only in nasopharyngeal swabs processed via extraction kit. Accurate and rapid diagnosis could aid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic management by identifying, isolating, and treating patients rapidly.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Brazil , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL